I think the biggest difference is that I include a step to identify the people who should do the thing, assuming that the author of the plan is not, then, doing the thing. I think this is an important difference, but would not argue with the quality of questions in the above linked doc
@evan: I love this: the thoughtful scaffolding of thinking.
Your step of identifying the people - that's a key difference because:
1. Usually, people who are good at starting things may not be good at running it.
2. The process of letting go/transitioning your early stage org requires a founder to go through quite psychological process (I was researching it for my PhD so very passionate about it)
very related: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ziUjrt_8rWLmScwNQdprwDuDmNRWHt6tmTZnlAhGRzM/
I think the biggest difference is that I include a step to identify the people who should do the thing, assuming that the author of the plan is not, then, doing the thing. I think this is an important difference, but would not argue with the quality of questions in the above linked doc
@evan: I love this: the thoughtful scaffolding of thinking.
Your step of identifying the people - that's a key difference because:
1. Usually, people who are good at starting things may not be good at running it.
2. The process of letting go/transitioning your early stage org requires a founder to go through quite psychological process (I was researching it for my PhD so very passionate about it)